Editorial methodology

Iridia’s methodology describes how research is shaped into educational pages about mining, hardware, energy, infrastructure and staking. It is intended to make scope and uncertainty visible rather than to create a sense of certainty where evidence is limited.

Every topic is treated as a dated editorial project. Protocol rules, equipment specifications, facility conditions and third-party statements may change, so the publication date is part of the meaning.

Research sequence

  1. Scope: define the protocol, equipment, location, time period and reader question.
  2. Source: locate primary documents, public records and relevant technical references.
  3. Compare: identify agreement, disagreement, missing context and different measurement methods.
  4. Draft: separate fact, attribution, interpretation, example and open question.
  5. Review: check dates, units, terminology, accessibility and compliance wording.
  6. Update: record material changes and offer a correction route.

Source handling

Source typeUseLimitation to note
Protocol documentationRules, parameters and governanceMay change after an upgrade
Equipment specificationDesign capabilities and requirementsNot a facility performance record
Public reportContext and observed informationMay use a different scope or date
Interview or statementAttributed perspectiveShould not be presented as independent verification

Quality checklist

  • Are the unit, date and measurement boundary clear?
  • Is the subject identified precisely rather than by a broad label?
  • Are commercial relationships and conflicts considered?
  • Does the wording distinguish an example from a prediction?
  • Can a reader contact Iridia about a factual error?

Working principles

“A source gives a statement context; it does not remove the need to read the statement carefully.”
“A dated explanation is more honest than an undated impression of permanence.”

Iridia uses these principles for education and general information. The pages are not financial, legal, tax or engineering advice.

Review and contact

Readers may write to 15 Teheran-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06130, Republic of Korea, or call +82 2 7981 3546. Requests are acknowledged within 7 calendar days where practicable and reviewed within 30 days. This methodology was reviewed on 22 September 2026.